In this module, students explore the ways in which the
comparative study of texts can reveal resonances and dissonances between and within texts.
Students consider the ways that
a reimagining or reframing of an aspect of a text might mirror, align or collide with the details of another text.
In their textual studies, they also explore
common or disparate issues, values, assumptions or perspectives and how these are depicted.
By comparing two texts students understand
how composers (authors, poets, playwrights, directors, designers and so on) are influenced by other texts, contexts and values, and how this shapes meaning.
Students identify, interpret, analyse and evaluate the textual features, conventions, contexts, values and purpose of two prescribed texts.
As students engage with the texts they consider how their
understanding, appreciation and enjoyment
of both texts has been enhanced through the comparative study and how the
personal, social, cultural and historical contextual knowledge
that they bring to the texts
influences their perspectives and shapes their own compositions.
By responding
imaginatively, interpretively and critically
students explore and evaluate
individual and common textual features, concepts and values.
They further develop skills in analysing the ways that
various language concepts, for example motif, allusion and intertextuality, connect and distinguish texts and how innovating with language concepts, form and style can shape new meaning.
They develop appropriate
analytical and evaluative language
required to compose informed, cohesive responses using
appropriate terminology, grammar, syntax and structure.
By composing critical and creative texts in a range of modes and media, students develop the
confidence, skills and appreciation to express a considered personal perspective.
Key words
Fill out the table together with your tutor
Comparative study
A comparative study looks at two texts and evaluates the similarities and differences between them. The methodology envisions that looking at two texts can bring to light more meaning than looking at one text alone.
Resonance
a feeling, thought, memory that a piece of writing or music makes you have, or the quality in a piece of writing, etc. that makes this happen. (Cambridge dictionary
Dissonance
disagreement (Cambridge dictionary) Allow us to come to terms with cognitive dissonances within our everyday experiences ‘discomfort felt when holding contradictory views’ ‘yields a feeling of discomfort’ ‘lack of harmony’ – the aspects of a text that differ and/or possibly contradict another text’s
Mirror
How certain ideas and perspectives are reflected/similar in Reflecting/copying
Align
Agreement, similarity.
Collide
Unable to reconcile
Common
Disparate
Values
(beliefs and moral/ethical positions)
Assumptions
(assumed knowledge of audience)
Perspectives
(of the subject matter)
To shape meaning
Conventions
Context (explain each)
Historical context
Geographical context
Cultural and religious context
Social context
Personal context
Textual features
Concepts
Innovating with language concepts
Form
Style
Informed responses
Cohesive responses
Motif
Allusion
Intertextual connection
Conventions
Structure
Summarise the Rubric
#1 What are the keywords in the rubric that you must use in your assessment and may also encounter in unseen questions?
resonances and dissonances
reimagining or reframing of an aspect of a text might mirror, align or collide
common or disparate issues, values, assumptions or perspectives and how these are depicted
#2 What is the main goal of the rubric?
dentify the ideas in the source text
Identify what the adapted text says about these ideas (perspectives)
How did the two different contexts influence perspectives on the key ideas?
How have the two texts depicted the key ideas?
Refer to intertextuality in adapted text from source text